Profile on Andy White - Anthropologist, Archaeologist, and Artist by Mary Catherine Ballou  

"The world already has enough straight lines.  And too few dinosaurs." - Andy White Andy White 1

 ~

DINOSAURS, RABBITS, DRAGONFLYS – oh my!  Hailing from Michigan, anthropologist and archaeologist Andrew A. White, Ph.D., moved with his family to Columbia last July, in the middle of a sweltering Southern summer.  White holds the position of Research Assistant Professor with the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of South Carolina.  However, in his spare time, he creates animal sculptures out of scrap metal and found objects.  With a background in welding, White uses his metalworking skills to construct artistic renditions of various species in the animal kingdom.

 

Working out of his garage, Andy White has built a sundry of creatures, including a Tyrannosaurus rex, triceratops, rabbit, snail, dragonfly, and crow.  While each sculpture currently remains in his yard, the broad-based appeal of these whimsical yet sturdy designs cannot be ignored.  The detail and craftsmanship in his work is readily apparent.

From afar, the pieces sit like industrialized replicas of magnificent creatures, some with outsized proportions that make them all the more striking.  Upon closer inspection, the time and consideration taken by White in piecing together the anatomies and choosing relevant parts quickly emerges – household objects ranging from silver spoons to frying pans decorate the sides of various animals.

It seems natural for White’s artwork to occupy public or private spaces of various sorts. Displaying his sculptures would serve as a welcome addition to the art scene in Columbia, livening up our city with a recycled art form that is both refreshing and memorable.

Andy White kindly agreed to answer the following interview questions.  His responses will hopefully spark the Columbia community to learn more about this scientist and artist. Thanks Andy!

~~~~~

When did you first start making sculptures?                                                                            

White: I’ve been trying to make things for as long as I can remember, so it’s not really a question of “when” but a question of changes in “how” and “what.”  I started welding in 2010.  Learning how to weld steel made it possible for me to assemble larger and heavier things than I ever could before, allowing me [to] make bigger sculptures that could survive outside.  Before I began to weld I worked with sheet metal on and off for years as best I could, using bolts and screws to build three-dimensional pieces and using tacks to make two-dimensional designs attached to wood.  The ability to weld removes a lot of constraints on what you can and can’t physically make with metal.  Aspects of my personal and professional life kept me from welding during most of the last few years, but I’m happy that I’ve got the space and the time to do it again now.

What inspires the subject matter for your sculptures? 

I like making animals because of their curves.  Not only do I think that curvy things are more interesting to look at (I like Art Nouveau much more than Art Deco), but building something curvy makes it much less problematic that I’m a sloppy artist and a terrible welder.  While I admire people who are very good technical welders, I don’t want to have to sweat the details of straight lines.  The world already has enough straight lines.  And too few dinosaurs.

A lot of the pieces of metal that I use have personal associations with certain times or places.  I like putting those things into a sculpture because it creates a kind of scrapbook – those bits and pieces hold memories, and creating something new with them gives those memories a physical place in the present.  I’ve found that blending memories together makes some of them blurry, but I think that’s okay too.  Ferrous metal will rust away into nothing eventually, just like memories do.  You have to make conscious decisions sometimes how much effort you’re going to put into preserving relics of your own past.  What do you hold on to and what do you let degrade into nothing?  My sculptures provide a way for me to work through that.

 

Andy White 2

Can you please describe your artistic process, if any, for creating your pieces?                     

It usually starts in my head with an idea for something I want to build rather than holding a piece of scrap in my hand and saying “this could be an eyeball” or something like that.  I will generally browse pictures of living animals online or in books and see if I can find a posture that I like for whatever creature I’m thinking about.  Sometimes I’ll print out an image and take a few measurements to guide scaling the anatomical proportions somewhat accurately.  But often I’ll just keep eyeballing the piece as I go, adding things for strength, volume, shape, etc., and trying to get the key attributes I’m looking for to “click.”  Sometimes I’ll have a piece of metal that I really want to use because I like the way it looks or because it has a strong memory attached to it, but I won’t be able to find a place for it.  Sometimes I get “stuck” because I don’t have things around that will make what I’m building look like what’s in my head.  Sometimes I find something new on the street and it takes the piece in a different direction.  Sometimes a change of direction is probably for the better, and sometimes it’s probably not, and usually there’s no way to know because you have to choose a path and go with it.  Sometimes I’m in love with what I’m doing, and sometimes I hate the damn thing.  Sometimes I burn myself or cut myself, or something falls off the sculpture or the crane falls over on me.  Eventually I become more interested in working on something else, and whatever is inside the garage gets put outside.  That’s how I know it’s done.

Why did you choose to pursue Anthropology and Archeology as your profession?       

Humans and human societies are the most difficult things in the world to study and understand.  We are part nature, part culture, partly the products of our environments, and partly bound to history.  And while studying human societies in the present is difficult, studying them in the past is even harder.  Archaeologists have to find ways to make credible statements about the past based on a pretty sparse jumble of material evidence that is intentionally or unintentionally left behind.  We can’t directly observe the societies we want to study, but have to look for patterns in those few material traces that remain. We have to not only compel those things to tell stories, but we have to find ways to test those stories and see if they make sense.  The science of the human past may be the most challenging kind of science one can choose to do.  But that also makes it the most fun.

How does your background in Anthropology/Archeology influence your metalworking?

Indirectly, I think, in a couple of ways.

First, the material evidence that archaeologists work with is largely the debris of everyday life– stuff that’s been discarded, lost, left behind.  Sometimes the things that end up in the archaeological record have symbolic meanings attached to them, but often they don’t.  Sometimes things that are thrown away lose their original meanings but are later used by someone else who may attach new meanings.  That’s sort of what I do as well, creating objects with new meanings from collections of cast-offs.

Second, three-dimensional things require a structure that provides both strength and form.  There are different strategies for doing that in the natural world (you can have your skeleton on the inside, like mammals, for example, or on the outside, like insects and crustaceans).  Each has its advantages and disadvantages.  There are different strategies for organizing human societies, also, that are associated with different strengths and vulnerabilities.  When you build something artificial, you have to think about the sources of strength and form.  Does the strength come from some kind of robust central frame, or from the interconnectedness of numerous smaller parts?  Do the same structures provide both strength and form?  Building three-dimensional objects out of scrap metal presents logistical and artistic challenges, the “solutions” to which can have parallels in both natural and cultural phenomena.

 

Andy White 3

Do you have any future projects in store? Would you ever be interested in making public art?                                                                                                                                                                                 

I always have something in the works . . . sometimes I sweep the garage floor between projects, and sometimes not.

Everything I’ve done so far has been (mostly, anyway) for me.  I make what I want when I have time to do it.  I enjoy the process and the results, and those things together make it rewarding.  Purposefully making something to be displayed in public would change that equation somewhat, but it would be fun to give it a shot if it was an interesting idea that I thought I could pull off and the product would be somewhere I could take my kids to see it. I would have to make some adjustments to produce a piece suitable for a public, outdoor space: it would have to be less ornate and I’d have to pay closer attention to leaving sharp edges.

What's one of the most bizarre items you have found on the streets? Have you ever encountered any problems picking up debris from the curb?                                         

I’ve found much stranger things doing archaeological fieldwork than I have cruising the curbs.  I cannot mention those things.

Did you ever expect to garner publicity surrounding your at-home art projects?  

No!  They’re in the back yard for a reason!  It’s flattering when people have nice things to say, but I’d do it regardless.  As long as my family likes them well enough that I can keep some in the yard, I’m good.

Just for fun: If you could time travel, what time period would you go to? 

I think I’d probably go back to the Middle Paleolithic, around 200,000 years ago.  Despite all the human fossils and archaeological sites that we know of from this time period, there remain intense debates about what humans and human culture were like then.  Although it’s a poorly understood time period that I would like to visit, however, I think I know enough about it to know I wouldn’t want to stay for long.

 

 GALLERY

andy white 4

Andy white 5

Andy White 6

Andy White 7

Andy White 8

Hoechella: Rock against the patriarchy by Ony Ratsimbaharison

hoechella Next month a festival to raise awareness on body-positivity, called Hoechella, will run August 26-27 at New Brookland Tavern. The festival, organized by local musician and stage actor/director, Kari Lebby, was created to combat “slut shaming, rape culture, and unjust legislation that affects people's bodily autonomy.” This event will be completely free, thanks to Girls Rock Columbia and Girls Rock Charleston, who procured funding for the event, Lebby says.

The decision to throw this event came from a desire to subvert the idea that expressing ones sexuality should be shamed and made to be a bad thing. “It isn’t a bad thing,” Lebby says. “What is a bad thing, however, is the marginalization of women, people of color, and queer people.” By holding this event, they wish to bring artists and leaders from these communities together for visibility and to encourage everyone to be comfortable with who they are, and to be informed about issues that affect us all.

The festival will feature local and regional acts, almost all of them including at least one member who is queer, a woman, or a person of color, according to Lebby. Debbie and the Skanks, Cyberbae, MyBrother MySister, Glittoris, and Can’t Kids will be performing, just to name a few. They cover a wide range of genres, which was another important factor in booking. This is to showcase diverse acts and to hopefully bridge some of the gaps in our ranging music scene.

Hoechella became a fully-realized festival in what seemed like no time at all, but that was not without the help from people and organizations in our community. “I just have crazy ideas, but it takes a ton of people to make it happen!” Lebby says about seeing Hoechella come to fruition. People from the organizations Girls Rock Columbia and Girls Rock Charleston, along with the staff at New Brookland Tavern helped to solidify their plan, while others helped with things like the organizing and designing of the logo.

Lebby hopes this event will encourage people to start speaking out against rape culture, body shaming, slut shaming, and unjust legislation. It will hopefully add a new spin on the typical shows we see here in Columbia, with added awareness and encouragement to be comfortable with one’s self and their personal choices.

For more information, check out Hoechella.org.

Full list of performers

Can't Kids, Say Brother, Debbie & the Skanks, MyBrother MySister, She Returns from War, Glittoris, Sandcastles, Paisley Marie, Del Sur, Cyberbae, BRBN, and Sugar St. Germain.

6 SONGS FOR SUMMER, 2016 by Alex Smith

 

"It is happening...again..."

-The Giant in "Lonely Souls", episode 14 of TWIN PEAKS

Eight months is a blink of an eye these days. I used to call songs like these "prescient". Now I just think of them as reminders I can shake my ass or slow dance to, but reminders, nonetheless, that we're not learning anything from history. And these days, history keeps getting closer and closer...

Listen to these songs. Shake your ass. Slow dance. But LISTEN. If they don't seem topical right now, just wait until it is happening again. Because it will.

One

David Bowie - "It's No Game (Part 2)" from the 1980 album SCARY MONSTERS (AND SUPERCREEPS)

"I am barred/from the event/I really don't understand this situation/so where's the moral?/People get their fingers broken/to be insulted by these fascists is so degrading...."

Alex David

 

Two

The Clash - "English Civil War (live)" outtake from the film RUDE BOY

"It's still at the stage of clubs and fists/hurrah....hurrah/a well known face got beat to bits/hurrah...."

 

Alex Clash

Three

Rolling Stones - "Street Fighting Man" from the 1968 album BEGGARS BANQUET

"Everywhere I hear the sound of marching charging feet, boy/'cause summer's here and the time is right for fighting in the street, boy...."

 

Alex Stones

 

Four

Stevie Wonder - "Big Brother" from the 1972 album TALKING BOOK

"My name is secluded/we live in a house the size of a matchbox/roaches live with us wall to wall/you've killed all our leaders/I don't even have to do nothing to you/you'll cause your own country to fall...."

 

Alex stevie

 

Five

John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band - "Woman Is The Nigger Of The World" from the 1975 album SHAVED FISH

"If you don't believe me take a look at the one you're with...."

 

Alex john

 

Six

Nina Simone - "Ne Me Quitte Pas" written by Jacques Brel, from the 1965 album DON'T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD

This song was my sole response on social media after the terrorist attack in France. Eight months ago.

alex nina
 Eight months is a blink of an eye these days. But these days, eight months ago is so easily forgotten that it's history, too. Listen to these songs. I'll see you in the street.

-Alex Smith

July 15, 2016

~~~

Alex Smith is a multi-talented visual and performing artist , based in Columbia, SC, who also writes.

 

 

Girls Rock Columbia Rock Concert Announced - 20 Bands!

GIRLS

Girls Rock Columbia Campers Conclude Fourth Year of Camp with Rock Concert 20 bands comprised of 77 8-17 year olds take the stage Columbia, S.C.

Girls Rock Columbia campers from two sessions will let their confidence shine at a showcase this Saturday at Columbia Museum of Art. The showcase will last from 3pm until 5pm and the doors open at 2pm.

The camp, which concludes its fourth year of camp on Friday, extended its programming to two weeks this year. The first week of programming catered exclusively to teenagers and those teenagers applied what they learned as junior counsellors during the second camp session, for campers 8-12. In addition to learning a traditional rock instrument and writing a song, campers also participate in band coaching, and workshops; Audio Console Mixing, Stage Presence, Herstory of Women in Rock, Body Positivity, Building a Pedalboard, Rock Photography and Zine Making.

“Too often people look at youth as having the potential to be something powerful someday,” said Mollie Williamson, executive director, “but at Girls Rock Columbia we think it’s important to recognize that these kids are change makers today. They are brave, powerful and changing the word right now. It’s really incredible to see them recognize that in themselves over the span of five days. Kids who are too shy to speak into a mic the first day are playing drum solos and screaming out lyrics by the end of camp. Being a part of helping these youth recognize their potential for making positive long lasting changes in the community is something that I feel so proud to be involved with. These are a generation of kids who are going to change the world.”

In its fourth year of operation, Girls Rock Columbia has more than quadrupled in size. Girls Rock Columbia is a non-profit organization dedicated to fostering a community of girls, trans* and non-binary youth in Columbia and empowering them through music education. The program encourages an environment that cultivates self-confidence, challenges gender stereotypes, promotes positive relationships, creativity, and leadership. The ultimate goal of Girls Rock Columbia is to empower everyone involved; both campers and volunteers, to take the sense of community learned from within the organization and carry that throughout the city they call home.

Admission to the showcase is $10 for adults and $5 for kids under 12. Children 3 and under are free. Doors open at 2pm. For more information about Girls Rock Columbia, please visit www.girlsrockcolumbia.org or follow on Twitter and Facebook.

Review: Green Room by Ony Ratsimbaharison

Green room

"Green Room is the manifestation of my worst fears on tour." -- Ony Ratsimbaharison, who is about to go on tour

An unsuccessful tour takes a turn for the worst in Green Room (2016), a horror film by director Jeremy Saulnier, about members of a punk band forced to fight for their lives against a group of white supremacists in a remote part of Oregon. It’s an overall good film with the right mix of punk, gore, and suspense.

The Ain’t Rights, a band made up of Sam (Alia Shawkat), Pat (Anton Yelchin), Reece (Joe Cole), and Tiger (Callum Turner), are struggling to finish their tour with barely any money. They are offered a last-minute show when a careless booker promises they’ll get paid well. They are, however, warned that they’ll be playing for Neo-Nazis, so they should be cautious and avoid talking politics. After their set, they and another young punk (Imogen Poots) witness a violent crime and are soon fighting to make it out of there alive.

The gory and suspenseful unfolding of events is gut-wrenching, and at times it feels almost too real. And just when you think it couldn’t get any worse, it does. This is not for the faint of heart, but there are instances of dark comedic relief and cinematic beauty. The subject matter is intense, though, there are pretty violent deaths.

The first half is accompanied by the muffled sounds of live heavy metal/grindcore playing in the background, as they discover that the Neo-Nazis are not only trying to cover up for their crime, but they’re setting the band up in the process. As the band struggles to get out, the skinheads become more hostile and violent towards them. Patrick Stewart plays Darcy, the leader of the white supremacist group and owner of the club.

The actors give stunning performances in this film, which came out in April of this year. The original soundtrack, provided by Brooke Blair and Will Blair, is heavy and brash, off-set by the occasional ambient interludes. It also includes a couple songs played by the fictional band featured in the film. The dynamics of the band also seemed more accurate than most depictions of young musicians.

Green Room is the manifestation of my worst fears on tour. Going 90 miles out of your route to play a virtually non-existent show and making close to nothing from it is a nightmare of its own. To then get sent to a play for a bunch of skinheads adds to the horror. The band is soon forced to use guns and anything else they can find to fight the Nazis.

The film has a good mix of suspense and horror, not too heavy on the gore but it is pretty bloody. The fact that this could legitimately happen of course adds to the scariness. I would recommend this movie to anyone about to go on tour (if you dare), or anyone who likes horror or has ever dreamed of covering the Dead Kennedys’ “Nazi Punks Fuck Off” to a room full of skinheads.

 

Jasper intern and blogger Ony Ratsimbaharison sets out this week on her own performance tour with her band FKMT.

Susan Felleman and Kristin Morris Talk with Jasper about the Bechdel Test & Women in Film by Mary Catherine Ballou

Bechdel test The Bechdel-Wallace Test, also known as the Bechdel Test, emerged out of the 1985 comic strip by Alison Bechdel entitled “The Rule.” In order for a film to pass the Bechdel test, it must satisfy three rules:

  1. There must be two female characters
  2. Who have a conversation with each other
  3. About something other than a man

At first glance, these may seem like simple stipulations for a film to meet. Yet, many films surprisingly do not pass this test. According to a study completed by Walter Hickey of FiveThirtyEight.com, “In a larger sample of 1,794 movies released from 1970 to 2013, we found that only half had at least one scene in which women talked to each other about something other than a man.” In light of this statistic, it remains imperative to realize that the Bechdel Test does not provide a definitive measure of a film’s overall worth. For instance, some films do not pass the test but they still portray strong female characters. For example, the movies that comprise The Lord of The Rings trilogy do not pass the Bechdel Test; however, each of the films showcase powerful female characters such as the elves Galadriel and Arwen, played by Cate Blanchett and Liv Tyler, respectively. On the other hand, some films that might be interpreted as vapid or sexist, such as this summer’s Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates (released July 8, 2016), manage to pass the Bechdel Test.

 

Despite these variables concerning which films pass, the Bechdel Test still reveals an inherent bias against women in film. While the Bechdel Test is certainly not a conclusive source for judging film quality, it reinforces deeper implications like the ingrained prejudice against women in our culture and the sexist stigma prevalent in the film industry today. While it may not provide a comprehensive measurement of film quality, the test still provides insight into the bias displayed against females on screen. Moreover, it sheds light on subliminal messages frequently espoused by the media that relegate women to demeaning roles. We must acknowledge these subconscious messages that perpetuate cultural and sexist stereotypes.

 

As with any struggle, there are ups and downs in the progress towards gender equality on screen. Nonetheless, female actors seem to be making strides, as demonstrated by some recent summer releases that feature female leads and pass the Bechdel Test. Such films include The Shallows and Ghostbusters. Starring Blake Lively, The Shallows (released June 24, 2016) tells the story of a woman attacked by a shark who must fight for her life while stranded on a rocky outcrop. The Shallows contains more depth than one may initially expect before viewing – Blake Lively’s character acts as an instrument of her own fate, and she succeeds in an impressive way. Even though a male figure appears at the end of the film, he does not act as her savior – she survives due to her own actions, instincts, and will to live. Moreover, the female-dominated cast of the new Ghostbusters (released July 15, 2016) demonstrates a step in a more gender-equal direction within the realm of blockbuster films.

 

Even so, it remains difficult to gauge the full extent and future of women’s progress on screen, due to the perpetuation of male-centric films, and because the Bechdel Test does not provide a complete measure of a film’s inherent feminism. If nothing else, the test serves as an intriguing surface-level assessment that evaluates on-screen gender disparities and the roles portrayed by women in our male-dominated culture. Clearly, it suggests a rampant and inherent misogyny bred within the movie industry. Of course, many differences between the sexes are to be celebrated; yet, misogyny remains something that females must contend with in both private and public spheres, on and off the screen.

 

With these thoughts in mind, two local Columbia professionals, Susan Felleman and Kristin Morris, kindly agreed to be interviewed and share their thoughts regarding the Bechdel Test and the state of feminism in film today. Each of their answers provides insight into this culturally and historically relevant topic that cannot be ignored. Their interviews appear below:

 ~~~~~

Susan Felleman is Professor of Art History in the School of Art and Design at the University of South Carolina

 

 

Jasper: How did you first learn about the Bechdel-Wallace test?

Felleman:  I am not really sure when I first heard of what was then referred to as the Bechdel test, probably in the late 2000s and possibly from Anita Sarkeesian’s “Feminist Frequency” blog and video series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLF6sAAMb4s

 

What was your initial reaction to the Test Requirements?

I guess I found it a useful tool, less for judging films than for getting students to see and think about the sexist conventions of movie stories. At the time I was teaching in a film program.

 

Do you find any downsides or shortcomings to the Bechdel-Wallace Test?

Of course, if it’s applied programmatically, which it shouldn’t be, as its origins are to be found in a couple frames of a comic strip. As Anita Sarkeesian notes, passing the test doesn’t make a film feminist, or even good. Conversely, it’s possible for a good film to fail the test, even a feminist one! For instance, I noticed that one of my favorite films, one I often teach, Sally Potter’s vanguard and gender-bending film Orlando (1992)—written and directed by a feminist filmmaker; and adapted from a feminist novel by Virginia Woolf—cannot pass the test.

 

Do you think the Test provides a helpful analysis of female roles in films?

No, not really. It’s more descriptive than analytical.

 

What are your general thoughts regarding the current state of feminism/female roles in films today?

Oy! Sometimes it seems that the more things change, the more they stay the same. As with filmmakers of color, women have made very slow inroads into mainstream film production as writers, producers, cinematographers, or directors. And, as with people of color and other minorities, the representation of women in commercial film tends to suffer from grievous bias, as well as tokenism. Women are still by and large treated as objects by an exceedingly conventional popular cinema, even in the occasional film in which they are permitted agency.

 

Things are a little better in independent and some global cinema, and considerably better in documentary filmmaking. And this new golden age of television has been remarkable for women, on both sides of the camera, although television, too, remains male dominated. I’ve noticed for a couple decades now that many women directors who’d had one or two breakthrough independent films but had fallen from view in Hollywood were increasingly turning up in TV credits. The fragmentation of the audience in the current TV environment has allowed for such noteworthy developments as the success of Shonda Rhimes and Netflix’s original shows like Orange is the New Black, Master of None, and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt (three series I enjoy!). That said, one mustn’t forget the added prestige and capital invested in shows with a more typical institutional imprimatur, like The Wire, The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, Mad Men, etc.

 

 ~~~~~

Kristin Morris is Marketing Manager at The Nickelodeon and President of the Board of Directors for Girls Rock Columbia

 

Jasper: How did you first learn about the Bechdel-Wallace test?

Morris: I can't remember the exact moment I first heard of the test, but I'd guess about 7 or 8 years ago? I've only ever heard it referenced as the 'Bechdel Test.'

What was your initial reaction to the Test Requirements?

Initially I think everyone jumps right into seeing if any of your favorite films meet the criteria - and quickly realizing that so many big commercial films don't.

Do you find any downsides or shortcomings to the Bechdel-Wallace Test? 

I think it’s a first step, but there are films I wouldn't necessarily consider 'pro-woman' that would meet the criteria. I remember reading an article how the film Sucker Punch passed the Bechdel Test, even though its arguably adolescent boy fantasy that objectifies young women. I also think that feminist thought has developed beyond the simplicity of the Bechdel test. Race, culture, gender identity, nor sexual orientation are addressed, which are all big parts of the feminist conversation we're having now.

 

I read a few years ago that Alison Bechdel actually came up with the criteria as a joke in a comic she wrote -- so I don't think it's initial intention was to be taken as a standard for feminist films. It was framed as the most baseline measurement that could still rarely be met. That's so sad you have to laugh at it, I guess?!

Do you think the Test provides a helpful analysis of female roles in films? 

Not really. If you go through the list of films that pass the test I don't think you'd see them having strong female characters with interesting and complex relationships. For example, here are some of the films that have been released this year that pass the test: Batman vs. Superman, The Purge: Election Year, Captain America: Civil War, and Warcraft. While these big budget movies technically meet the Bechdel criteria, none of these are primarily representing women.

 

What are your general thoughts regarding the current state of feminism/female roles in films today? I think the focus on women in film is expanding from acting to include directing, writing, producing, and crews. If you're ignoring all of the creative process before there's an actress on a movie screen, you're missing 90% of the process. Outside of the film world, we're looking at representation and who's making decisions. Governments and corporations are intentionally bringing more women on as cabinet members, executives and board members.

In 2015, women accounted for 9% of directors, up 2 percentage points from 2014 but even with the figure from 1998. In other roles, women comprised 11% of writers, 26% of producers, 20% of executive producers, 22% of editors, and 6% of cinematographers (http://womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu/research/). If we had more women at the writing table and behind the cameras there wouldn't be a need for tests like the Bechdel Test - maybe?

 

A lot of the work we do at the Nick is featuring filmmakers from marginalized groups. I'm working on a festival in November celebrating the 25th anniversary of the film Daughters of the Dust, which was the first film made by a woman of color to receive national distribution. We've invited 8 emerging female filmmakers of color to come to Columbia and exhibit their work and have conversations about their experiences as young women of color in the film industry. There's more info about the project here: http://nickelodeon.org/festivals/daughters/

 

 --Mary Catherine Ballou is an intern writing for Jasper Magazine.

Summer 6s - Al Black Chooses his 6 Favorite Summer Reads

Summer 6

According to poet and poetry guru Al Black, "It was difficult to choose six books that are my favorites, because tomorrow I would choose differently.  I chose based upon how the books resonated with and within me and how they still resonate with and within me; the list comes the residue left in my gut and in my dreams." 

These are words that we think ring true for most of us.

What are your 6 favorite summer reads?


 

Al 1

Transformations - Anne Sexton

I had read a poem or two of her work, but when I read 'Transformations' I came away shaking.  Here were poems that saw beneath the superficiality of fairy tales and saw the truth of the tortured souls the main protagonists were and in knowing them I knew more about the people around me and myself. This book of poetry still has the ability to show me something new about Anne, other human beings and myself - I pick it up every few years and reread it.

~~~

Al 2

At Play in the Fields of the LordPeter Matthieson

Peter Matthieson is an under-appreciated American author; all of his works are unique and compelling reads.  I read 'At Play in the Fields of the Lord' at a time when I was going through major life changes and this novel spoke to me in ways that goes beyond the printed page. Great story and great questions. Beware the movie made from the book was awful.

~~~

Al 3

Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck

Dear John , I wish I could of sat, shared a smoke, a cup of coffee and talked with you. Al

'Tortilla Flat' and 'Cannery Row' were small bits of revelation, but 'Grapes of Wrath' came down from Mount Sinai still crackling with thunder.  The description of banks and corporations recreated me as a left-leaning humanist and Tom Joad's, short soliloquy saying good bye to his mother, pushed me onto a path of social activism armed with only a shovel.

~~~

Al 4

Narcissus and Goldmund - Hermann Hesse

I have read all of Hesse's novels and poems.  'Narcissus and Goldmund' is small navel that can be read in one sitting it illustrates the duality that exists in each of us.  This small novel helped me become painfully aware of my sensual & freedom seeking side and how it collides with my desire for contentment, peace and living a spiritual life.  Precisely at that point of collision is where I am most alive.  This book, as with most of Hesse's books, is a story of the different major aspects of his personality personified in the characters of the story as they work through the questions they pose to one another. Great read.

~~~

Al 5

Memories, Dreams and Reflections - C. G. Jung as told to Aniela Jaffe

I first became interested in Dr. Jung because of his close friendship with and mutual admiration of Hermann Hesse.  Memories, Dreams and Reflections is Jung's telling his life story, but not in a chronology; in this book I learned who C. G, Jung was and in knowing Jung I learned that I am not a chronology of events either, but rather a personification of my memories, dreams and reflections and that these may be more real now that when they occurred decades ago.

~~~

al 6

The Invisible Man -  Ralph Ellison

Ralph Ellison was a black writer of the mid-20th century who changed American literature's perception of what a novel can do and be. 'The Invisible Man' tells a story of black man as he journeys through America; it is at once funny, harsh, sardonic and full of suspense.  It is one of the masterpieces of 20th century American literature  - this should be on every high school reading list.

 

Note from Al: I look back at my list and realize that Anne Sexton is the only woman writer on this list - I don't know what this says of me, but I will take note and ponder why and maybe learn from it. A.B.

 

Al Black reading at dripA Hoosier in the Land of Cotton, Al Black is a published poet and organizes and hosts various literary, music and arts events throughout the Midlands of South Carolina.  He is the co-founder of and tours throughout GA, NC and SC with the Poets Respond to Race Initiative and is Director of the Rosewood Arts and Music Festival.

Orangeburg County Fine Arts Center presents -- Observation: An exhibition of drawings and paintings by five artists who work from life: Allan Anderson, Michael Cassidy, Blake Morgan, Anna Redwine, JohnHenry Tecklenberg

anna Where: Orangeburg County Fine Arts Center 649 Riverside Drive, Orangeburg, SC

In today’s world we’re numbed by images that are reproduced exponentially; we look at screens, and photocopies, and magazines. We also observe real things in our daily routines­­ landscapes, people, objects, animals­­ and dismiss them without a second thought. How, then, do we connect with nature, find meaning in the small objects in our lives, and make sense of the movement and change in the world around us?

These five artists use direct observation to commune with their subject matter, respond to the passage of time, and harness the vigor of life. Each picture in the exhibition was created deliberately through observation. The artists share a commitment to working from life and immerse themselves in their subject matter. The resulting images are unique documents of that experience.

“Observational painting is a way for me to engage nature. You are immersed in the landscape and in time and with the passage of time the landscape changes. For me, this is an opportunity to search for moments that will allow me to connect the picture together and sort through abstract ideas I have about painting.” ­

Blake Morgan

“I paint from observation because of a need to know the world more carefully and closely. I choose things that I find some sort of interest or meaning in. Many of the things I select to paint are a part of my everyday life. I place the subject in the studio and sit with it and try to get to know it. I witness the changes that a thing may go through and capture the most interesting stages. Poet Mark Strand said, “It’s such a lucky accident having been born, that we are obliged to pay attention” and further on he states “Most of our experience is that of being a witness. We see and hear and smell other things. I think being alive is responding.” (From Creativity: the Psychology of Discovery and Invention by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi) Susan Sontag takes it one step further; “To be a moral human being is to pay, certain kinds of attention.” My small paintings are my response to being alive.” ­

Michael Cassidy

“For me, art is the process of translating the life of another living thing through my own experience of observation. Drawing from life is therefore a critical aspect of my creative process. I think of drawing as extracting, more than just mark­making. If I tried to extract life from a secondary source, it just wouldn’t work. I have to watch my subject in order to understand what it feels like to be my subject, then I endeavor to share that through mark­making. Drawing from life is about empathy.” ­

Anna Redwine

“I believe observational painting is a journey into the very essence of communing with what one is attempting to represent, where it may take untold hours of looking at a still­life or figure to understand what one is painting and seeing. My practice revolves around painting from life the figure, the landscape, and still­life.” ­

JohnHenry Tecklenberg

“Working from life allows you to immerse yourself in the experience of the painting. Not only are you observing the subject in its physical setting, you are also recording it through a passage of time. You get to know the subject you are working on and begin to see new things as the time passes. I predominantly work from the landscape. In that environment you are exposed to all of natures elements. The arrangement of objects and relationships are constantly changing as the sun and light is always moving. It is up to the artist to pick and choose certain key elements as they move in order to develop a stronger composition. There is something about being in the same light and the same environment as the subject you are painting. Nothing beats the true color and value shifts that you can see when working from life. It allows you to see the space in its natural state and for you to depict the space how you perceive it. If you submit yourself to the subject, it sparks a deeper feeling of meditation.” ­

Allan Anderson

CONTACT: Michael Cassidy ­ cassidypainting@gmail.com

Haiku Death Match, or Learning about Creativity with Middle School Writers at Tri-DAC by Ed Madden

Photo by Lindsay Green-McManus  

This afternoon, it’s round two of Haiku Death Match.  The topics are deodorant and cheese.  The first round included haiku on Beyoncé and the beard of Darien Cavanaugh, one of the writing instructors.  The instructors write all sorts of topics on strips of paper—not just deodorant and cheese but French fries, love, bad smells, puppies.  These topics are drawn from a bucket.  The teams have 2 minutes to write.  They have given themselves team names—the Argonauts, NerdHerd 3.0, the Curators, Tomatoes. When time is called, someone from each team reads the haiku aloud—twice—for the judges.

 

Right, judges.  First there is the Panel of Death, a collection of mostly older students, who vote on the haiku.  Someone inevitably brings up questions of accuracy: what was the syllable count? how many syllables in “easily”? One reader explains that when he read: “Odor: / say your prayers now,” “Odor” was the end of the second line. Someone else shouts out: “That’s enjambment!” (Yes! They got the lesson on line breaks in poetry!)

 

If there is a tie, the decision goes to the Titans (the instructors).  And if there’s a tie among the Titans, well, bring out the Kraken—i.e. fiction instructor Cavanaugh, who will roar appropriately then vote thumbs up or thumbs down.  “Kra-ken! Kra-ken! Kra-ken!” they chant.

 

At some point, we usually ask that the haiku be sung. For clarity, of course.

 

~

 

At the Tri-District Arts Consortium, or Tri-DAC, I’m teaching creative writing along with a staff that continually amazes me and makes me laugh.  (And luckily, someone is usually ready to make a coffee run when it’s the needful thing.) The three-week summer program includes music, theatre, dance, visual arts, and creative writing.  Students audition to participate.  In creative writing we have about 50 lively and engaged students, rising 6th graders to rising 9th graders, some who have been here all four years.

 

In the Creative Writing Program (see our website here), practicing South Carolina writers teach essentials of creative writing from page to stage with exercises that promote creative development, revision, and performance. Along the way, students learn more than just how to become better writers—they also develop skills in effective communication, empathy, teamwork, and confidence.

 

Students in creative writing this year are taking poetry classes with me and with Betsy Breen, a poet who teaches at Hammond School; prose classes with Darien Cavanaugh, named the Jasper Artist of the Year a few years ago after he founded the Columbia Broadside Project; and classes in flash fiction and memoir with visiting artists Justin Brouckaert, a recent USC MFA graduate; and Carl Jenkinson, who teaches writing now at the Moore School of Business.  Past instructors and guest artists have included: Will Garland, Lindsay Green-McManus, Jonathan Maricle, Wendy Ralph, and Mark Sibley-Jones (who now teaches at the SC Governor’s School for the Arts). The whole endeavor is directed by Ray McManus, a poet on faculty at USC-Sumter who has an extraordinary ability to hold the attention of 50 rowdy middle schoolers.  Haiku Death Match was his idea for the late afternoons in the last week, when the instructors are getting a little punchy and the students are at their giddiest.  After two rigorous weeks of classes and daily writing activities, it’s a fun group activity that is collaborative and, despite the silliness, one that has students thinking about what makes a poem good, what makes a poem work.

 

~

Ray McManus - photo by Lindsay Green-McManus

 

Dr. Ray’s 8-10 Rules of Writing

 

  1. Do not ask yourself if you should disturb the universe. Instead ask yourself how.

 

  1. Rhyme is fine some of the time, but mostly it’s stupid.

 

  1. Editing is not the same as revising.

 

  1. No senseless writing.

 

  1. There is no such thing as writer’s block. There is no such thing as writer’s block. There is no such thing as writer’s block.

 

  1. When in doubt, say something outrageous.

 

  1. Typing is not writing.

 

  1. In writing there is no right or wrong, there is only weak or strong.

 

The students know these rules.  They can recite them.  In unison.  With enthusiasm.

 

~

 

Some of us have been working with Tri-DAC for years, some for the first time this year—but every year is really a first time, as we learn to work with each other and with a range of new and returning students, adapting our exercises to what other instructors are doing, and maybe trying to emphasize lessons students are learning in other classes. (Besides, if we reuse an exercise, returning students will let us know: “we did that last year!”)

 

Along with my class, my job the past few years has been the mini-showcase, a performance that falls at the end of the second week. Each art discipline performs during the showcase, usually highlighting their oldest students, especially the four-year students.  I’ve tried to create choral projects, where the students’ voices echo and converse with each other around a central theme or set of prompts.  One year we did prayers and curses.  (The entire audience moaned when one writer said, “May there be no presents under your tree.”)  One year it was a medley of poems about what we keep and how we worship, responding to poems by Naomi Shihab Nye (“Different Ways to Pray”) and Carlos Drummond De Andrade (“The Elephant”).

 

This year the students read two poems from Welsh poet Jonathan Edwards’ lovely book, My Family and Other Superheroes—“My Family in a Human Pyramid,” in which Edwards imagines his family building an impossible human pyramid, with his diapered godson teetering on top of his head, and “Building My Grandfather,” in which he imagines building his grandfather, one piece, and one story at a time.  (Read more about Edwards’ poetry here and here.)  So we began to imagine our families as soccer teams and cheerleading squads, as the cast of a play or the staff of NASA (with Grandma flying to the moon with her dogs, because she never goes anywhere without them).  And we, too, began to imagine building our grandparents, one piece, and one story at a time.

 

Here’s “Building My Grandmother” by Zach Frueauf, a rising 8th grader at Carolina Springs Middle School.

 

Building My Grandmother

by Zach Frueauf

 

We buy parts with the fifty dollars she gave me for my birthday.

We put her together steadily until we get to the knees,

they are rusty because she has done so much farm work.

We fill her lungs with the smoke she has inhaled from cigarettes.

We fill her heart with a new husband

to make up for the ones she had lost in the past.

We fill her brain with the music of her guitar,

and we put her hands on with care so she can play it.

Student Zach Frueauf - photo by Lindsay Green-McManus

 

In Breen’s class, the young writers wrote startlingly rich poems about places they’d been after reading South Carolina poet Terrance Hayes’s “New York Poem” (lightly edited for middle school students), and they produced amazing mythic versions of their own births after reading Alma Luz Villaneuva’s “Indian Summer Ritual.”  (One of our twin writers, Isaac Hill, wrote, in one of the loveliest birth poems, “I let Joe go first / He kicked me in the head. / It left no mark.”)  They also learned about showing not telling, about the value of specificity, while writing poems after reading Edward Hirsch’s “Cotton Candy.”  Breen asked them to write a poem about the last time they saw someone that they care about—“someone you haven’t seen in a long time.”

 

Here’s “Sharing a Coke” by Mara Lind, a rising 9th grader from River Bluff High School.

 

Sharing a Coke

by Mara Lind

 

I didn’t recognize you,

with a black shirt, dirty hair, and stubble.

You opened a coke but didn’t offer me one,

so I got my own,

sipping slowly.

Someone brought a radio and

the uncles danced with aunts.

My drink fizzed warm in my

stomach while we hid behind

hay stacks. You didn’t talk much.

I asked about school and

you answered.

When saying goodbye,

I had to stand tall to hug you,

and the pop tab fell between my fingers.

Mara Lind with Ed Madden - photo by Lindsay Green-McManus

 

Cavanaugh gets the students to create their own biographies based on a poem by George Ella Lyon, “Where I’m From,” as well as wacky little nonfiction pieces based on comedian Sara Silverman’s “Two-Minute Index” featured on the sides of Chipotle cups in their “Cultivating Thought” series. These are crazy fun.

 

~

 

Two of the boys are always farting.  One little girl has the whiniest voice I’ve ever heard, almost like fingernails on a chalkboard. If we don’t marshal them into Haiku Death Match, the room can devolve into arm-wrestling and discussions of how to talk like Yoda.  Matthew wants to show us card tricks.  Samantha drew a picture of me. Trevor tried to explain Pokemon Go to me. One day Scott brought his entire library of Animorphs books. On birthdays, we often have cupcakes.

 

It’s exhausting and exhilarating and every year I leave so thrilled to have been part of it.

 

And Friday night, July 15, we’ll have our final program.  The music and creative writing programs will perform together at 6:30 at the Lexington One Performing Arts Center.  Theatre and dance and visual arts have their final performances and presentations Saturday at Richland Northeast High School.

 

TriDAC is in its 31st year, the creative writing program in its 21st, the last 11 directed by McManus  To find out more about the creative writing program at Tri-DAC, check our website at www.cwtridac.com.

 

 

 

PROFILE OF RYAN MCEWEN BY OLIVIA MORRIS  

Ryan mcewen 1 Ryan McEwen's Facebook profile picture is the red-and-yellow outline of a person, one hand draped over a book, the other propped under their chin. This person is vibrantly outlined yet hollowed — the tree they're lying against, and swirling patterns on the tree, can be seen through the person's abdomen. The scenery is overlaid with a series of colorful patterns that are distinct from their surroundings, yet still connected to the overall shape of the trees, sky, and grass. The connection feels almost rhythmic, like a synaesthetic daydream, where patterns appear to be pulsating off the objects around them.  The person by the tree, mostly amorphous and suspended in boldly colorful abstraction, appears calm, even contemplative.

 

Clicking through McEwen's Facebook, the primary way to view his work, there are many similar pieces — flowing, unbroken lines that curl across the width of the canvas. Inspired since high school by Salvador Dali and M.C. Escher, McEwen is captivated by surrealism and mathematical repetitions, such as the reoccurrence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature. "The most beautiful things are soft, flowing curves... the growth of a flower, a hurricane on a satellite, a spiral galaxy," he explains. However, there are also photorealistic paintings, graffitti art of monochromatic patterns, and chalk art reminiscent of art nouveau. One of his most poignant paintings, a woman on a sailboat at sunset, is almost indistinguishable from the photograph it is based on. His style largely depends on the piece, and his emotion about the subject. He draws inspiration from artists such as Alphonse Mucha, William Adolphe Bougereau, and David Walker. McEwen also finds the beauty in everyday objects and attempts to capture them, or tweak them to their ultimate aesthetic potential. He describes himself as someone who will rearrange a flower bouquet in someone's living room to make it look more pleasing.

ryan mcewen3

 

McEwen describes one of his earliest memories as being about making art. It was '86, he was three years old, and his family had just bought their first VCR player. He recalls drawing Indiana Jones after they watched the Temple of Doom. McEwen is self-taught, aside from classes in high school. "I remember each one of my art teachers I had growing up. Each one of them certainly gave me attention and supported all of my efforts.  Having said that, I have to mention my family.  My parents and siblings always encouraged and promoted me," he explains of his training. His first painting was a surrealist piece, which he gifted to his brother.

 

McEwen has grown in popularity through word-of-mouth and his Facebook postings. He has accepted commissions, but he typically creates pieces either for himself or as gifts for his loved ones. He explains that fame and money are not what his art is trying to accomplish; it is more important is to have meaningful connections, to make someone smile. When asked about his mission, he says, "Humbly, I feel like I do have something to offer the world.  I never really feel like I'm competing with anyone or anyone's art directly, except for myself.  I'm always trying to top myself, with every new project."

ryan mcewen 4

INTERVIEW: USC Press's Jonathan Haupt on Young Palmetto Books by Mary Catherine Ballou

 

"We’re filling a gap in children’s literature by giving young readers and their parents and educators the chance to encounter smartly written, beautifully illustrated, and handsomely produced books exploring the people, places, events, and themes that have helped define South Carolina’s experience and that continue to shape our shared future." - Jonathan Haupt, Executive Director, University of South Carolina Press

Young Palmetto books

 

Founded in 2011, the Young Palmetto Books (YPB) serves as the Children’s Book Series created in conjunction with The University of South Carolina Press and the South Carolina Center for Children’s Books & Literacy. Geared toward younger readers in and around South Carolina, the first titles in the YPB collection were published in 2013. In the following interview, USC Press Executive Director Jonathan Haupt provides information about this exciting series for children.


 

 Jasper: Why did you decide to publish a new series?

 

Haupt: Since 1944 USC Press has been committed to publishing books about South Carolina that broaden our understanding and appreciation for the complexities and wonders of our home state. Young Palmetto Books was an opportunity to expand that mission to the benefit of younger readers, and to do so in a way that also highlighted a group of immensely talented writers and artists in, from, or otherwise of South Carolina. We’re filling a gap in children’s literature by giving young readers and their parents and educators the chance to encounter smartly written, beautifully illustrated, and handsomely produced books exploring the people, places, events, and themes that have helped define South Carolina’s experience and that continue to shape our shared future. We’re growing young minds with great books, and given that we’re the publisher of our state’s flagship research university, that educational mission is as much as a responsibility as an opportunity.

 

Jasper: Who are the key players in the publishing process?

Haupt: Young Palmetto Books is a partnership between USC Press and the South Carolina Center for Children’s Books & Literacy (SCCCBL), which in turn is a unit of the USC School of Library and Information Science. SCCCBL director Kim Shealy Jeffcoat serves as series editor for Young Palmetto Books and works with a dedicated editorial board of educators, writers, artists, and librarians to guide the direction of the series. I serve as the sponsoring editor for YPB at USC Press, and the Press’s expert staff of editors, designers, and marketers publish and distribute the YPB books alongside the nearly 1,500 other books currently in print from USC Press.

 

Jasper: How are the authors selected?

Haupt: Young Palmetto Books has two open submission periods each year, announced on the series website, www.youngpalmettobooks.com. The series editor and editorial board vet those hundreds of submissions for quality and fit with the educational, place-based mission of YPB, then recommend the best of those submissions to the Press. Those recommended manuscripts are then reviewed externally by expert peer reviewers selected specifically for each project and, assuming those reviews are supportive, then also by a 12-member faculty editorial board. All throughout this process, authors are given feedback to improve their work. Our rejection rate is very high, but so then is the quality of the books that do make it through this lengthy review and approval process.

 

Jasper: Do authors have to come to the Press with an illustrator, or does the Press acquire the illustrator?

Haupt: Picture books are not required to have completed art or even an artist in mind when being submitted for consideration, although we are open to that possibility. Of the picture books we’ve published so far or have under contract now, very few came to us with completed art at the onset. We’ve been really fortunate to get to work with some remarkably talented South Carolina artists on our picture books and our graphic novella, those of course in addition to all of the exceptional writers with whom we also work.

 

Jasper: What do you hope to accomplish with the Young Palmetto Books?

Haupt: We’re a humanities publisher, and the real goal of anyone working in the humanities is to help people become more informed, more inspired, more engaged, more empathetic, more responsible, more understanding of each other and of the world we share. That’s true of every book published by USC Press and it’s certainly true of our books for younger readers. We’re in this together, and that’s a valuable lesson to learn and relearn at any age.

 

Jasper: What honors have the Young Palmetto Books achieved thus far?

Haupt: We’ve only published twelve books to date, but I’m pleased to say that many of them have garnered honors already. Katie’s Cabbage by Katie Stagliano is perhaps our most award-winning YPB title so far, having been selected as the 2016 Together We Can Read book for Richland School District One and winning the 2015 Carol D. Reiser Children’s Book Award, a silver medal in the 2015 Moonbeam Children’s Book Awards for best book by a youth author, and a 2016 Christopher Award for books for young people. USC First Lady Patricia Moore-Pastides’ YA and family garden-to-table cookbook Greek Revival from the Garden: Growing and Cooking for Life also won a gold medal for cookbooks in the 2013 Mom’s Choice Awards, a silver medal for cookbooks in the 2013 Living Now Awards, a 2014 Eric Hoffer Book Award in the home category, and was a finalist in the cookbooks category of the 2014 International Book Awards. Our other book awards and starred reviews are listed on the YPB series website at www.youngpalmettobooks.com.

 

Jasper: Are there any other children's series like this in the Southeast?

Haupt: In part because of our very high rejection rate, we’ve gotten to be very good at recommending other children’s book publishers to authors, and there are no shortages of publishers in the Southeast—Arbordale, Peachtree, and Algonquin Young Readers, to name just three.

 

Jasper: How do the Young Palmetto Books answer the diversity needs that our culture so desperately requires now?

Haupt: Regardless of their authorship, we aim for our YPB titles to be as diverse as possible in their representations in text and art alike, but still in keeping with the context of their narratives. It can be a challenging balance to strike, but it’s a powerful moment when a young reader can identify with a character in a story, and an equally powerful moment when a character’s representation, when different from that of the reader, can expand a reader’s perception of self and of others. Increasingly, themes of diversity, inclusion, and empathy have become lens through which we assess the potential fit of new submissions for the series.

 

Jasper: Where can people go to read or purchase these books?

Haupt: Our goal with all USC Press books, Young Palmetto or otherwise, is that they be available to readers wherever they would normally go to engage with any other book, be that a local library, a local or chain bookstore, a museum gift shop, the major online booksellers, or any ebookseller. So the answer to your question of where can people go to find Young Palmetto Books—is everywhere. And we hope they will have a look at what we’ve done with the twelve books in the series so far and with the half-dozen more now under contract and coming soon, including a new edition of Louise Meriwether’s Freedom Ship of Robert Smalls illustrated by Jonathan Green and two more volumes in our Writing South Carolina series, highlighting the winners and finalists of the annual South Carolina High School Writing Contest, our partnership with the USC Honors College.

For more information about the Young Palmetto Books series, please visit www.youngpalmettobooks.com.

 

"... it’s a powerful moment when a young reader can identify with a character in a story, and an equally powerful moment when a character’s representation, when different from that of the reader, can expand a reader’s perception of self and of others. Increasingly, themes of diversity, inclusion, and empathy have become lens through which we assess the potential fit of new submissions for the series." - JH

Summer Sixes - It's about the BOOKS - by Sherard “Shekeese” Duvall

  Summer 6

 

Thank you to the incomparable Cindi Boiter and Jasper Mag for thinking of lil’ ol’ me for this Summer Sixes blog series. I am always very humbled and honored when (for reasons I still cannot figure out) people are interested in anything I have to say - so, thank you. I LOVE to read, which I don’t know if many people know that about me. So I’ll share my summer six of which, I believe, are six awesome books to read this summer. With that said ... let’s get to it … in no particular order. - Sherard Shekeese Duvall

SUMMER READS

 MAMADAYMama Day | Gloria Naylor | 1988

Ironically, it was my mama that put me on to Mama Day. My mom was, and still is, a ferocious reader. And often either bought or told me about books to read. This is a favorite of mine from my high school years that came at a time when I was consumed with anything black and anything science fiction. What’s even better, the story is based on the coastal islands of South Carolina, so there are numerous fictional references to the Gullah people here. I still haven’t figured out why this hasn’t been optioned as a movie yet - if you read it on your next road trip, you’ll see why it should be.

 

 Down second avenue

 Down Second Avenue | Es’kia Mphelele | 1969

I have a ‘thing’ for writers and writing that is very authentic. I love it when the characters and their dialogue, even if you have never met anyone like them, to your brain, feel real. Mphelele brings you into a world that lets you know EXACTLY what it was like on the ground in segregated South Africa as a young college student trying to find ones way in society. It’s these types of everyday life stories that can literally make you forget that you are reading until you realize there are no pages left. Excellent quick read for a weekend trip.

 

 mission earth

 Mission Earth Decalogy | L. Ron Hubbard | 1985-1987

Got hours and hours of time to burn on vacation this summer? How about a wildly, sexual, violent, multi-galactical science fiction romp for your imagination? I discovered this series also when I was a teenager, at a time when I was burning through comic books and looking for something more for my wild imagination to devour...and oh...what a wild trip it WAS. Way before I knew that L. Ron Hubbard was L. RON HUBBARD, I ate these crazy sci-fi stories up. I remember, before I could afford to buy em, my mom would go on shopping trips to the mall and I would hide in Waldenbooks for hours reading these absolutely off the wall stories. Need a wacky mind trip? You found it.

 

 EARL

 E.A.R.L.: The Autobiography of DMX | Smokey D. Fontaine | 2002

The phrase “you think you know, but you have no idea” was a popular tagline for VH1’s Behind The Music, but should have been the marketed description of this self-portrait. On DMX’s debut album, “It’s Dark and Hell is Hot” (which, once you read the book, you find out is scarily apt) he rhymes, “Feel the pain, feel the joy...of a man...who was never a boy... for real.” You don’t really GET what that means until you take dive into the deep water of what is Earl Simmons’ life. It’s very dark, and hard, and complicated, and beautiful, and emotional -- if there was ever a rose that grew from the concrete...it was DMX. Pack this in your carry-on bag for your next long flight.

 

 walden

 Walden | Henry David Thoreau | 1854

Thank you to my Columbia High 10th grade English teacher, Ms. Tate ... wherever you are. When I first read this book, I had no idea who Thoreau was and even less of an idea of what the heck a Walden was. This is one of the books that I love because it struck a chord with me at an age when I was trying to find out who and what I was. Reading about this man’s inner thoughts about how we lived and related to the world around us felt a lot like the questions that were pinging around my head at 15. Need a brain getaway? Walden is a great read for a long day on the side of a mountain overlooking a forest. Hello, Appalachia.  

 

 manchild

 Manchild In The Promised Land | Claude Brown | 1965

This is my favorite book of all time. And, to me, the most important book of my life. What Claude Brown was able to do in this autobiographical account is literally the blueprint to inner-city America. It is one of the most textured, tangible and authentic reads I have ever experienced. Like my own childhood, it details perfectly the conflicted life of growing up too young and too soon in an environment that is dealing with a toxic mixture of the effects of racism, classism, sexism, poverty, crime, and about every ill you can fit into a neighborhood - juxtaposed with the happiness, joy, fun and bliss of growing up in a place that - despite the broken glass and winos - you call home. The characters and conversations leap off of the page and put you right smack dab in the middle of the place that birthed the ingredients that created hip-hop culture. You want to understand how complicated and beautiful and creative and cold that life can be growing up in the inner-city? There is NOT another book better. Period.

~~/~~

Sherard Shekeese Duvall = TV/Film Producer | Media Literacy Educator | Media Consultant | Hip-Hop Advocate & Executive Producer, Co-Owner at OTR Films

shekeese

 

FILM REVIEW: WEINER BY OLIVIA MORRIS

weiner  

 

"This documentary is so invasive of Weiner's personal and political life that the audience is left asking, 'why did he let them keep filming?'"

 

Weiner is a recently released documentary directed by Josh Kriegman and Elyse Steinberg, following Anthony Weiner, former representative of New York's 9th district, and his attempted reascension to political prominence.  The film revolves around Weiner's run for mayor of New York in 2013, in which he tries to distinguish himself from a humiliating sexting scandal that led to his resignation from Congress in 2011.  He was caught sexting multiple women nude pictures of himself, and the media backlash was unrelenting.  Despite this, for the first half of the documentary, he seems to be remarkably successful.

 

His wife and Hillary Clinton's top aide, Huma Abedin, speaks fondly of him when he announces his newfound mayoral campaign.  His office space, which initially housed only a single folding table, grows into a city of makeshift cubicles, overflowing with frenetic twenty-somethings.  A Quinnipiac poll taken from July 18th to July 23rd places Weiner as the frontrunner.  On July 23, in the middle of filming, a second scandal shocks the American public, the film crew, and even Abedin.  Weiner had continued to sext various women after the first scandal broke, this time under the nom de plume 'Carlos Danger.'

 

One of the most compelling aspects of the film is the relationship between Weiner and Abedin.  When the second scandal breaks, Weiner and Abedin begin a mission of inscrutable damage control.  The team is gathered into a small, whitewash room with nothing but an economy table, a few shattered chairs, and a mounted television.  Anxiety seems to vibrate off of the group as the details of Weiner's sexts display dimly off the television.  Abedin appears calm while making calls, the phone wedge between her shoulder and ear.  Then, she glances at the television and sees one of the explicit images her husband sent.  For the first time in the documentary, Abedin's facade breaks, and her jaw hangs open.  She turns to Weiner and they stare at each other silently for more than twenty agonizing seconds, recorded in high definition, before Weiner asks everyone to leave them alone.  While many documentaries have to dramatize glances and grasp at faux pas, Weiner's spectacle is held in the unflinching authenticity of this silence.  This documentary is so invasive of Weiner's personal and political life that the audience is left asking, "why did he let them keep filming?"

 

The film does not portray Weiner as a sulfur-and-smog noir villain, a trope all too popular in political television dramas.  Weiner isn't characterized as a buck-toothed, big-headed caricature, mindlessly throwing out buzzwords.  Instead, Weiner is a relatively charming, impassioned man with a fatal flaw.  His downfall echoes the pattern of a Greek tragedy — a successful man is brought down by his own unrelenting lust.  The documentary does an excellent job of providing a balanced view of Weiner.  The filmmakers rely heavily on their own footage, but also give the perspectives of news outlets, comedians, and those who campaigned for and against Weiner.

 

The film is unpredictable and remarkably compact, jamming an incredible amount of incendiary gossip into just 96 minutes. Weiner explores the depth of political corruption and the complexity of marriage in the public eye, and shows us more than we ever wanted to see of Anthony Weiner.

What Volunteering for Girls Rock has taught me by Ony Ratsimbaharison

Girls rock more  

 

 

 

 

 

I never had anything like Girls Rock when I was a child, but I’m so glad it exists. Girls Rock represents everything I hoped my world could be as a young girl, still so unaware of how systems of oppression were (and still are) working against me. It’s everything my soul was calling for when I was young and felt alone and misunderstood, unable to fully wield my voice.

The first time I volunteered for Girls Rock was at the Charleston camp in 2012. It was truly transformative and I gained a whole new perspective. The next year, I volunteered for Columbia’s first ever Girls Rock camp and I again learned so much from the experience. Volunteering for Girls Rock is more than just being a camp counselor or a glorified babysitter. It’s a place for campers and volunteers alike to reclaim their voices and use them to spread positivity and fight against the injustices we face in society—and, of course, to know that we rock!

"It’s a place for campers and volunteers alike to reclaim their voices"

One goal in growing up is to not repeat mistakes, and this applies to what we teach to the youth at Girls Rock. We want to save them from the horrible things we had to deal with. We want them to know that it’s okay, and it will get better, because it did for us. We need to advocate for them because our society deems it unnecessary for them to advocate for themselves, and they are often unheard. Girls Rock is one of the ways in which young people can feel comfortable enough to express themselves with no judgment or punishment. So here are just a few of the many things I’ve learned from Girls Rock:

1. IT’S OKAY TO BE LOUD

While I’m no stranger to playing my music loud, offstage I’m sometimes more mild-mannered and quiet, as was encouraged of me and most young girls growing up. Every now and then, I need to remind myself that it’s okay for me to be loud. It’s okay to scream sometimes and let it all out. This is why at camp we have scream circles, where we each take turns letting out a scream, as loud as we can. It’s a great way to get everyone loosened up and a healthy reminder to release any emotions we might have, rather than to keep them bottled up inside us.

2. ART IS IMPORTANT TO LIFE

I can’t stress this enough. The campers at Girls Rock make art through music and other mediums during various workshops and down-time throughout the day. Being surrounded by so much creativity for a week is rejuvenating, to say the least. Seeing the way it affects the campers and their progress is awe-inspiring. They become more comfortable with themselves and start to trust their instincts. They also learn new ways to express themselves, and do it fearlessly.

3. TAKING RISKS IS EVERYTHING

The campers are taught different instruments for one week (many for the first time ever) and form bands and write songs, which are then performed for a large crowd of people at the end of the week. If that’s not bold and courageous then I don’t know what is. The fact that they are able to work through their nerves and put themselves out there in such a way is extremely inspiring. It reminds me to keep pushing to let go and take those risks I often overthink about.

4. WE ARE MORE THAN OUR PHYSICAL APPEARANCE

So much more. One thing we stress at Girls Rock is to refrain from physical compliments. This is because even positive physical compliments reinforce the notion that we are valued by our physical appearance, another idea that is virtually inescapable for young girls in our society. Instead we try to give compliments about people’s strengths and personal achievements, which empowers them so much more.

 

"even positive physical compliments reinforce the notion that we are valued by our physical appearance..."

 

5. WE HAVE SO MUCH TO LEARN FROM YOUNG PEOPLE

I’m always floored by the level of competence and sheer fierceness our campers exude. Not only are they capable of learning so much in so little time, they perform so gracefully under pressure. Being young is hard enough when you are taught to be “seen and not heard,” like most kids are. This is why it’s important to advocate for the youth. As soon as we are able to recognize their ability to teach us, we will be able learn from them.

 

 

Check out more about Girls Rock Columbia here!

THEATRE REVIEW: Trustus Theatre production of Green Day's American Idiot, by Kyle Petersen

TrustusAmericanIdiot (1) I was 17 years old when Green Day released American Idiot, their politically-tinged punk rock opera that at the time felt like the most lively and visceral protest music response to the Bush years and the Iraq War. So I was basically who the record was about, with all the buddings of political awareness tied up elegantly with suburban disaffection and adolescent angst. The surge of three chord rock songs and overwrought punk snarl mimicked the adrenaline coursing through my veins, and its rock opera ambition made the music seem as grandiose and important as my emotions felt.

While the album was well-received at the time as a sharp, of-the-moment critique of its time, something which felt mostly absent from the younger generation of artists, looking back on the album now, particularly in its guise as a Broadway musical, which debuted in 2010 and now serves as the finale to Trustus Theatre’s 2015-2016 season, lessens some of that temporality.

In his program notes, director Chad Henderson notes how thrilling it is to “work with this cast and production team to tell this story that, at times, feels like it’s been taken from our collective diaries” while also comparing to the 1967 counterculture musical Hair. That strikes me as particularly apt--as much as Billie Joe Armstrong might have been responding to his frustrations over new millenia Republican nonsense, he’s really working through some very archetypal coming of age themes that have been a part of American culture since the invention of the teenager in the post-World War II era: rebellion, shiftlessness, love, loss, and resignation. And it’s the timelessness of those themes, and how readily and ably Armstrong invokes them in his songs, that really give the album-turned-musical legs.

The Green Day frontman collaborated with director Michael Mayer (Spring Awakening, Hedwig & the Angry Itch) on the book that sketched out just a bit more narrative from the original album, adding minimal lines of dialogue and additional songs to make the three main characters--Johnny (Garrett Bright), Tunny (Patrick Dodds), and Will (Cody Lovell)--more distinct, but other than that it’s the staging and performances themselves that are the real draw here. Utilizing a large cast and an industrial-punk set (designed by Baxter Engle) marked by television screens flickering through images of war, news, politics, and pop culture (both from the 9/11 era and our current Kardashian/Trump moment), this is a jukebox musical at its best. The technical achievement here, given the number of mobile microphones, screens, staging levels, and musicians required, is stunning, borrowing elements from both a live concert and a music video as the show dictates, something absolutely necessary given the relative thinness of the plot.  

Bright owns his aspiring rock star-turned-junkie leading role, conveying just the right notes of youthful earnestness and foolhardy brashness that Green Day celebrates. As one of the central deliverers of Armstrong’s signature vocals, he also distinguishes himself by shifting from the rough adenoidal bray the frontman sometimes uses to a sweeter, more melancholy style that better fits the narrative, particularly on a couple of the crucial acoustic numbers. Both Dodds and Lovell also acquit themselves nicely, turning in great performances as the punk-goes-military recruit dude and (too)-early blue collar father archetype, respectively, as does Michael Hazin as St. Jimmy, Johnny’s devilish alter-ego. The presence of St. Jimmy as a character and Hazin as a performer also provides a necessary counterweight of rock star swagger to the waves of emo-ness that the play at some points almost drowns in. And while the women characters are mostly relegated to the backseat of this boy-centric story, Katie Leitner as Heather gets some quality time in the spotlight as Tunny’s pregnant girlfriend and hits some quality high notes to give the show some diva pizazz, while Devin Anderson plays Whatshername with a magnetic power that absolutely rescues the part from its tertiary role. Avery Bateman also sparkles in limited use as the Extraordinary Girl.

For all the great individual performances, though, this show hits its high points when the large cast is all out on stage together reveling in these songs. The two big medleys from the album, “Jesus of Suburbia” and “Homecoming,” shine particularly bright, as the large house band rockets through them with glee from their perch above the stage (led by music director Chris Cockrell) and the young chorus gets to holler the closest things to anthems produced in their own teenage years. “Nobody likes you/ everyone left you/they’re all out without you having fun” they sing with earnest abandon. We’re coming home again, indeed.

In those moments, I was often surprised by how well most of the songs translated so deftly to the stage, even for folks who aren’t necessarily fans of the band and familiar with the album, thanks to how electrifying it is to see them brought to life. In fact, I would say the more familiar numbers, like the opening "American Idiot," might have suffered a bit more than the theatrical album cuts which already has quite a bit of dramatic flare even before adaptation.

As for those that are or were fans of the album, like much of the cast obviously is, there’s a level of catharsis to living through them that can’t be denied. Seeing them all come out in a long line at the end of the night to take their bow, smiling as much in their eyes as their faces, in all of their rock ‘n’ roll sweat and glory, is to witness something a bit more than just another musical. They’ve really celebrated the power of music as rebellion, as salve, and as salvation, itself. And that's really something.

Green Day's American Idiot runs through July 30th. For ticket information go to trustus.org 

Jacob West opens show at Wired Goat & Travis Bland has a chat with him

Local artist Jacob West has his fingers in many pies. Jasper noticed that West planned to put some of his visual arts skills on exhibit coming up this Friday the 8th at the Wired Goat Coffee House down in the Vista, and we asked frequent Jasper contributor David Travis Bland to come up with a few questions for West to give us a little insight into what makes the man behind the music and the visual art tick. Here's a bit of that conversation. west c

 

 

I think I've always had the sneaking suspicion that southern cities and towns have a dark side, a seedy underbelly just underneath, not necessarily negative, but dark all the same. --- Jacob West

Music is a big inspiration for you. What’re some acts and song that motivated you to pick up the brushes?

 

I listen to a lot of different kinds of music and like to pull inspiration and imagery from all different places. Most of the pieces for my newest showing have been done fairly recently, and were inspired in part by some newer albums. The first three that come to mind are:

Deftones – Gore – This album is gritty, beautiful, and haunting, all the things I try to make my paintings.into

Aesop Rock – Impossible Kid – This album is dark, honest, and personal. I admire artists that can be open and honest, because I try to do the same thing with my art.

Chance the Rapper – Coloring Book – This mixtape is just too damn good and I can't stop listening to it.

~~~

This show features other local artists. Who are a couple local artists you dig?

 

I grew up in Columbia, so I've been extremely lucky to run into a lot of talented artists around town. There are three guys that I think are just on a whole other level:

John Stroman – I've known John a long time, and am just blown away with every piece of his I see. A lot of his pieces are on found materials, so he ends up with some really unique canvases to paint on. He also paints animals a lot, like I do, but where my work is usually pretty dark, his end up full of joy and just make you smile. I can't say enough good things about John or his work.

Alex Smith – Alex is another super talented artist from around town. He's a writer, director, actor, painter, I don't even know what all else he does! He recently had a show at Tapp's, full of extraordinary pieces. His work is usually a little haunting and just pulls you in instantly. I love art that can do that.

Sean Rayford – I've always been a huge fan of Rayford's work. He used to work at New Brookland and took pictures of all my favorite bands. Then I saw the pictures he took of Charleston and the State House when the flag was coming down, he's just been consistently capturing powerful and compelling images for as long as I can remember. I'm glad he's finally getting the recognition he deserves.

~~~

Each of your pieces are like self contained stories—snapshots of narratives. What are some of those stories and how did you visualize them on the canvas?

That's really what I was aiming for with my latest images. I felt that for a while now, my stuff has really depended on symbolism. This time around, I wanted to see if I could tell a story. I have a kind of loose narrative in my head for these new paintings, I named this group of paintings “Out Where the Grass Don't Grow”. They're supposed to be snapshots of different places and things happening in a fictional, romanticized version of a small southern town. I think I've always had the sneaking suspicion that southern cities and towns have a dark side, a seedy underbelly just underneath, not necessarily negative, but dark all the same.

~~~

You never had any formal art education. Do you think that’s allowed you to develop your own style? Has not having any training held you back in any way?

I think not having gone to art school did help me in certain ways. Years ago, I went to a comic convention with my sketchbook in hand and a young man's ambition. I did the thing that all young artists do at comic book conventions, I tried to get a job. My sketchbook was embarrassingly bad, but I did get a lot of great advice from the professional artists there. At the time, I was still deciding whether or not to go to art school, and every single person I asked for advice told me not to go. They said that my work had a strong voice of its own, and that I'd lose it if I went to art school. I'm not sure if they were saying that because my sketchbook was so terrible, or because they meant it. But either way, I didn't go to art school, and kept drawing, painting, and doing my own thing.

I've never really thought about how things would have turned out had I gotten formal training. I suppose i'd be better and maybe have made some important contacts. But, I'd also have art school debt.

~~~

You said your art is Southern Gothic in ways. Would your style be different if you weren’t born and raised in the South? (is that the case, you’ve always been around the south?)

I was born and raised in South Carolina. I was born in Lexington, spent some time as a kid in Charleston, then moved back to West Columbia in middle school, and moved downtown as an adult. Though, I've been lucky enough to travel all over the U.S and even Central and South America, I feel like the south (for better or worse) has a rich history and plenty of good and bad to pull from for inspiration. I have the feeling if I wasn't from around here, there's no way my style would be the same. I can't really put my finger on it, but there's something special about the American South. Our culture and community is special and unique and I hope that comes across in our art.

~~~

What does it mean to make it as an artist for you? Like is having a day job and being recognized in your community enough or does making it mean your livelihood comes exclusively from art?

I'm not sure, because every time I think I've made it, I set a new goal for myself. I remember thinking that “made it” meant that I got commissioned to paint for somebody. Then, I made it the first time I got to hang my art somewhere for sale and sold it. Then, I made it again when I had my first solo show. I keep moving the benchmark, so I don't think I'll ever make it. That being said, it sure would be awesome to be my own boss and paint for a living.

~~~

You get to do a portrait of anyone past, present, or future live in the flesh. Who is it?

Definitely the very first cave painter. The guy that invented 2D visual art.

 

Travis

BOOK REVIEW: CHUCK KLOSTERMAN'S BUT WHAT IF WERE WRONG? BY OLIVIA MORRIS (with a response from Kyle Petersen)  

But What if we're wrong "I've spent most of my life being wrong," states Chuck Klosterman in the opening sentence of his newly released book, But What If We're Wrong? (Blue Rider Press, 2016.)  From this initial confession, Klosterman builds his model of universal wrongness, stating that many theories held to be objectively true will inevitably be deconstructed in the future.  He deals with the durability of the theory of gravity, the importance of the U.S. Constitution, and predicts a morphing in the literary canon.  He supports his claims by including brief interviews with experts in these various fields, and even when they disagree with him, he continues to develop his theories.

The most striking aspect of this book is Klosterman's shamelessly egocentric assumptions.  Klosterman makes a series of bold claims about the future of literary greatness predicated on one single idea: that the person who will define our generation is currently unheard of.  This obscurity won't be in the sense that we define Kafka as "obscure."  Kafka was published and in a circle of writers and intellects.  But rather, Klosterman suggests that this person will be entirely unread in their lifetime.  In theory, this person is holed up in their room right now, shoving their work in a padlocked trunk.  Greatness will be defined by some ramblings on privacy, rotting away on the Deep Web, which archivists will comb through like archeologists to find a hidden piece of the 21st century.

While these ideas are intriguing, they rely on a series of assumptions about the future that Klosterman himself admits are impossible to predict.  Nonetheless, he fixates on the idea that future greatness will be attributed to someone unknown, even providing a list as to what they may write about.  Klosterman puts blind faith in every baseless conviction, coming to this conclusion via internal logic, despite most of history and experts advising otherwise.

Klosterman is dealing in pop philosophy.  He claims that someone unknown will rise to prominence because the future will want fresh perspectives.  Not only do they want a different perspective, but also one that has been entirely unheard of.  Because with the creation of the internet, most perspectives have been heard, and therefore the future will search for increasingly obscure writing.  Hence the Deep Web.  As evidence, Klosterman references Junot Diaz's idea that the literary canon is inevitably going to become more diverse.  Almost all well-read people agree with that.  This trend has already begun.  But from that idea, Klosterman assumes that the canon will rapidly become so diverse that the only new wealth of information will come from someone entirely unread.  While it is an intriguing concept, it is hyperbolized to the point of absurdism.

In the second half of the book, Klosterman deals with ideas such as "what if gravity isn't real?" and "what if democracy isn't so great?"  But these are not new ideas.  People have already philosophized, researched, and put into practice these theories.  On the flip side, the people who don't know these ideas are not given sufficient evidence to ever get a comprehensive understanding of them. The entire book feels like a summary of an offhanded remark Malcolm Gladwell made about the state of the world.

What If We're Wrong? still seems like it will culminate at the end; We feel like Klosterman will explain why he has chosen to predict the future of the literary canon, rock 'n' roll, the US Constitution, and the concept of gravity.  Instead, he just rambles about a series of things that he finds interesting, with little to no cohesiveness.  But he vehemently claims at the beginning of the book that it isn't a collection of essays.  He means to create an image of the future and a paradigm for examining the present.  But most of his arguments are predicated on platitudes, making the entire book feel underdeveloped, unsubstantiated, and unoriginal.

Response from Kyle Petersen, Assistant Editor of Jasper and Frequent Cultural Apologist:

I get your frustration, Olivia, and it seems reminiscent of a lot of the criticism of Klosterman's writing for his NYT column The Ethicist: that he is self-serving, represents other people's ideas incorrectly or superficially, and spirals around a bit in his own meta-reflections rather than advancing a cogent argument.

That being said, your point about "pop philosophy" is well-taken and seems to excuse the book in some sense. Since the concept of the book is patently absurd and admittedly impossible to pull off, and that Klosterman admits all of that right from the get-go, makes this a bit of self-aware sophistry that finds some amusement and stimulation in its own intellectual cul-de-sacs. Klosterman makes the kind of (relatively) astute points about literature, music, and television that he's known for while also providing plenty of the self-ingratiating humor that marks his signature style. He's a bit weaker on the science and politics ends of things, but it also feels like a nice way to illustrate how arguments about culture are always kind of arguments about how we understand the larger world as well. If the ride gets bumpy and digressive in parts, well, he warned us about that too.

There's a moment near the end of the book, in between talk of baseball statistics and octopi, where he gets to the nut of the rationale behind the book: "There is not, in a material sense, any benefit to being right about a future you will not experience. But there are intrinsic benefits to constantly probing the possibility that our assumptions about the future might be wrong: humility and wonder. It's good to view reality as beyond our understanding, because it is. And it's exciting to imagine the prospect of a reality that cannot be imagined, because that's as close to pansophical omniscience as we will ever come."

Whether or not the arguments in this book are uniformly solid (we can probably all agree they are not), the value in spending a few hours going through Klosterman's experience feels edifying, for precisely the reasons he suggests.

INTERVIEW: Edward Schmunes, Photographer by Mary Catherine Ballou

Schmunes

Local artist Edward Shmunes incorporates photography and mixed media to create two-dimensional art.  Shmunes has been photographing for twenty-six years and counting, with pieces in shows, collections, and galleries across the country.  In the following interview, Shmunes kindly discusses his artistic background, inspirations, and process, revealing the importance of passion and instinct in his artwork.

 

Jasper: How did your interest in photography develop?

Shmunes: “I’ve been coloring since I was three, so I’ve always done that, I colored instead of [making] model airplanes.  I had limited interest in most things like Erector sets, similar to Legos, the Legos of my years – I really didn’t like that stuff.  I always wanted to color, color, color.  I never had an expensive camera until I became a dermatologist.  My partner and I decided to buy one for our practice…a 35 mm camera for the first time in my life.

 

I went to Charleston in the 70s and took some pictures.  I was a good friend with the Chair of the Department of Photography at USC, he saw them and said they were good and that I ought to do something with that.  I put something in the State Fair and won top prize in the amateur section, then I started putting stuff in galleries because it seemed to work.  At that time they had some art fairs downtown [in Columbia] before Vista Lights [existed] – things in the spring like a May festival. I remember I had a booth set up on the museum grounds, and the director came and bought a piece for the museum – that made me feel really good. I started entering shows…I’ve entered hundreds of national art shows [and] I got these affirmations that the stuff was good.”

 

Jasper: Have your artistic interests always been confined to photography, or have you explored other mediums?

Shmunes: “I’ve never had any training, just a natural eye for what’s good and what’s bad.  I painted a little bit in medical school…[but] photography is instantaneously satisfying.  I do better with a jumpstart, so even if I may take a picture and run with it and change it, that jumpstart is helpful for me, as opposed to a blank canvas.  [I] use photography as a quick springboard to start with an image…because my work is described as somewhat surreal, it does involve manipulation.  Early on [in the pre-digital age], I used to add dyes to glossy photographs (when glossy photos are printed they are in a water system…these are water soluble dyes, you can put them on a shiny surface and [they] dissolve into the surface so it doesn’t leave a mark but you can add colors).  Part of my approach to art in general is to have something that is engaging and fresh, hooks the viewer…[it] might not be on a conscious level at first.”

 

Jasper: What role does digital photography now play in your artistic process?

Shmunes: “I have a friend named Dixie Allen, [she] used to teach computer graphics at USC, layout the Riverbanks Zoo Magazine, [and currently] makes Clipart on a national level.  She helped me learn Photoshop, for which I’m immensely grateful.  She gave me the basics…I’m no Photoshop whiz, but I have enough knowledge.  It’s just another paintbrush…as with all tools you can manipulate things differently.  I’m careful not to have something look [too manipulated]…if it screams manipulation before you can even see it, that’s a blockade to the viewer’s enjoyment.  You have to know what works.

 

I go on lots of trips, I look at every picture [I take] in Photoshop because it can be blurry as can be, and I might say, ‘Wow look at this blur!’  Or I wasn’t even aware that [something] wasn’t even over there...[so I] crop it and store it to be used for another photograph – it’s very time consuming.”

 

Jasper: Where does your artistic inspiration come from?

Shmunes: “It comes from the things that shout ‘take me!’  I like to be in a fresh, new area because your mind is open to new [things]…there are so many things that shout ‘take me!’ and so I listen to it and take it, because to me, they’re yelling! Sometimes you get it. [Other times] you’ll see the picture and wonder why it said ‘take me!’ and sometimes you’ll see in the middle is where something was screaming…you usually can find it when you look at the picture. It’s pretty true, follow your instincts…I do get rid of a lot of stuff, there’s so much that’s distracting in a picture, whether it’s a line leading you out or a chandelier that looks like it’s growing out of a person’s head.”

 

Jasper: Are there any parallels between your artistic and professional career?

Shmunes: “Dermatology is visual.  I went into something that I could see – you recognize clinical presentations by the nuances of their color, also feel – but visuals are hugely important.  That’s why they have Teledermatology - that whole field of having rural access to specialists via television cameras is very important for rural [practices].”

 

Jasper: If you could give some advice to aspiring photographers, what would it be?

Shmunes: “My advice would be to not let people tell you what to do, because they’re going to tell you the conventional things to do.  When work stands out, it’s usually not conventional, so if you want to be a conventional artist, go take a lot of courses.  I’ve never had any courses, I resist it…

 

I love looking at other people’s stuff, taking it in, I get very vitalized and enervated by looking at other people’s work and listening to them – [but] that’s different from going to a photography course.  I’m not a nature photographer.  If I was, then I’d see why I’d want to take courses from a master nature photographer.  Or if you’re doing darkroom work then you need to learn technique like that…I’m not doing stuff like that.

 

Just when you look at other people’s works and go to museums and shows, that is a lesson, or you hear somebody talk about their work - those are what I love doing, as opposed to taking a workshop.  Now, I might benefit from a technical, Photoshop workshop…

 

Photography has been a stepchild of art for a long time.  Particularly in the South…photography is new on the scene.  A lot of big cities have art shows and they are multimedia [as opposed to just photography shows]. In terms of advice to people, the materials you use really do matter.  Starting out, you are limited in your budget…it can really detract from a piece to have a [cheap] frame.  If you really love your piece, then use good materials to show off your piece.”

 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Shmunes is fortunate to have exhibits at galleries such as City Art in Columbia.  He states, “I’m very proud of City Art – the caliber of the people, they have not turned it into a gift shop.  They have the building space to rent out and the art supply store downstairs.  It’s a very hard business, selling art…but they’re going to keep it mainly a gallery, they have high standards.  And the gallery I’m in in Charleston is an interior design place (Mitchell Hill Interiors) that’s very high-end.”

 

Shmunes is currently working on photos he took in Australia of various subjects, ranging from animals to Aborigines.  However, Shmunes explains: “I’m not a nature photographer, I don’t normally photograph animals…[also] I love to write and have tangential commentary that hopefully compliments the piece, [and] adds to the humor or mystery.  I gravitate basically to things that are surreal…they are going to be edgy and sometimes quirky.  That’s normally what I like because it’s fresh and different, so I try to put that into a landscape if I can do something that makes it special.”

 

For more information and to view portfolio images, please visit edward-shmunes.pixels.co

Greg Slatery's Summer 6 TV Binges w/ a note from Cindi

Jasper is not impressed by folks who say, "I don't watch TV," or "I don't even own a television," because usually we're distracted by the nose hairs they're waving at us as they regard us from above, and because anyone who gives a flip flop about art knows that we are living in the age of great television. Some of the most transgressive, provocative, insightful writing and some of the most poignant, multidimensional acting the airwaves (forgive our archaic idiom) have ever seen is happening now. And with alt sources like Hulu, Netflix, Amazon, Youtube, Crackle, Twitch, and Sling, cordcutters don't even have to own a dreaded television in order to partake of rich, mind-expanding culture.

I won't indulge in an essay about my 6 favorite TV retrospective binges (Six Feet Under, West Wing/Sports Night/Studio 60 (love me some Sorkin), Northern Exposure, Breaking Bad, The Riches, Hamish McBeth), but Stereofly's Greg Slattery put together a thoughtful list of surprises that makes me want to take another look at my choices the next time I hunker down with a pile of cats and some Ben & Jerry's Coffee, Coffee, Buzz, Buzz, Buzz for a little me-expanding-my-mind time.

Here are Greg's top 6 TV Series indulgences for those hellacious summer afternoons in the Soda City when you've got nothing but AC and a remote control in your sites. - Cindi

 

spawn pete

Adventures of Pete & Pete

While pegged as a children's show, Nickelodeon's Adventures of Pete & Pete holds up over time, offering the same joy to show veterans while still maintaining a level of quirky genius to appeal to those who missed out on the show when it first broadcast. Big Pete's voice of reason collides with his younger brother Pete's resistance to both authority and the mainstream, offering hilarious and relatable tales of growing up. You can pick up the first two seasons on DVD and online, but the third season has yet to be officially released...but the mighty power of YouTube has all three seasons available if you can put up with some video quality issues (it's worth it).

spawn showme

Show Me A Hero

This HBO mini-series is based on the non-fiction book by Lisa Belkin, following former police officer Nick Wasicsko as he runs for mayor of Yonkers, NY, in 1987 and the effect of a federal mandate to scatter public housing among the white middle-class neighborhoods in the city. If you are a fan of the work David Simon and William F. Zorzi have done together on The Wire and Treme, their six part mini-series holds the same investigative flame they're known for to both race and wealth.

spawn other

Other Space

Paul Feig, most loved (by me) for his role in Freaks and Geeks and Undeclared, produced a science-fiction original series for Yahoo! last year called Other Space that never got much attention and was canceled when Yahoo! axed its on-demand streaming service division. The series follows a highly inexperienced crew who accidentally get launched into space with no clear vision on how to return. Mystery Science Theater 3000 fans may notice creator Joel Hodgson starring as the ship's mechanic and his robot sidekick A.R.T. sharing the voice of Crow T. Robot. The only stars in the series are the ones outside the ship, but Feig's direction provides a goofy science-fiction series for those looking for a less technical trip through space. A Yahoo! search for Other Space will pull up the only season, but according to Feig a second season will come even if he has to shoot it on his iPhone.

spawn dare

Marvel's Daredevil

If you've missed this Netflix exclusive, you have two incredible seasons for binge watching. Following the story of a blind lawyer with superhuman powers, Matt Murdock (a.k.a. Daredevil) takes to the streets to clean up the mess the justice system leaves to leave unscathed. This is one of the greatest comic book screen adaptations, using appropriately grimy scenery to set the dark tone for this action-packed superhero drama. If you felt the Daredevil film with Ben Affleck was a travesty, this series will bring you sweet relief. If you need more after two seasons of Daredevil, give Marvel's Jessica Jones a watch.

spawn wilfred

Wilfred

Following a failed suicide attempt, Elijah Wood's character Ryan can now hear his neighbor's dog Wilfred talk. This dark, twisted comedy explores the difficulties we all face in life with a canine serving as the voice of good and evil, though the line between the two is almost always blurred. Life lessons are common themes shrouded in pot smoking and debauchery. Though the series was ultimately canceled by FX, the crew was given enough warning to tie up loose ends for a satisfying, four season show that might be one of the stranger TV programs to date.

spawn stargate

Stargate: Universe

I highly recommend watching the 1994 film Stargate prior to the series, only because it's a great film and offers some foundation for the story. If you've seen Stargate SG-1 and weren't a fan, I understand. This is different. This is better. As a crew flees an attack on their base on a remote planet, the team's scientist dials the Stargate to the ninth chevron to avoid taking the battle to Earth. As they cross through the Stargate they find themselves aboard an abandoned spacecraft known as Destiny. If you like the 2004 reboot of Battlestar Galactica, you'll appreciate Stargate Universe's dark exploration of what makes us human.

 ---

993806_10102012113630077_1293185004_n

Greg Slattery is a tireless concert promoter and editor of the zine Stereofly and one of the founders of the independent record label 10 Foot Woody Records. Slattery is also a guitarist and singer/songwriter in the rock band Shallow Palace and plays guitar and bass for a variety of other acts around town, including Brian Robert & The Hollerin' River Talkers, among others.